I'll look into this,

the only 'real' optimization we need to be doing is the caching of the
ObjectName.  The rest (switch and stuff) is code candy.

marcf

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:30 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: JBoss-dev
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] new container optimizations & bug [ #515542 ]
|
|
|I was looking over this bug and realized that with the container
|optimizations you added that no JMX compliant client (or adapter) will
|function correctly unless they have been specifically coded to use our
|Invocation objects.
|
|I now understand what is going on here, I was confused at first because
|of the invoke() method looking like a Proxy IH, but it is part of the
|DynamicMBean API.
|
|Is this really what we want to be doing?
|
|Wouldn't it make more sense to provide a separate invoke-like method
|which functions with these optimizations?
|
|For example, if invoke(), did the normal thing of taking actionName and
|translating that into a method call, then a invokeOptimized(Invocation)
|could be used to speed things up for internal usage.
|
|It would still go through invoke, but the first thing it would do would
|check if actionName is "invokeOptimized", then branch to that method,
|which would do what invoke() does now.
|
|Else it could use the typical reflection fluff.
|
|In order for this to work, methods will have to be provided for each of
|the functionality which is currently swicthed.  The optimized switch
|would call the method and the standard invoke would reflect to it.
|
|Since we don't need to expose any public here we could even make them
|private for any compile time speedups that would get us.
|
|Clients would then invoke the action "invokeOptimized" instead of
|passing in "" or garbage as they do now.
|
|I assigned the bug to you for the time being.
|
|--jason
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to