We are screwed until Juha & co put out a jmx-lite implementation out,

I don't think we need the full enchillada, juha, in fact I find the full
enchillada difficult to digest.  I don't want all the services.  Can we get
a "bare-bones" JBossMX or MBoss.  So we can get JBoss on MBoss?

In clear, can we get rid of the JMXRI today and replace it with our
implementation?

marcf

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:52 AM
|To: Ken Sipe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 is official
|
|
|The sun jmx ri doesn't give you the entire source tree too, right?
| So we're
|screwed until sun fixes jmx for 1.4?
|
|Bill
|
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken
|> Sipe
|> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:08 PM
|> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 is official
|>
|>
|> I just tested jdk1.4 with the latest on jboss 3.  It has the same
|> introspection failure it's always had.  For those interesting in the
|> stacktrace here you go:
|>
|> 11:03:06,601 INFO  [ServiceCreator] code org.jboss.web.WebService
|> 11:03:06,731 INFO  [ServiceCreator] code
|> org.jboss.management.j2ee.SingleJBossSe
|> rverManagement
|> 11:03:06,821 ERROR [ServiceController] Could not create MBean:
|> jboss.management.
|> single:type=J2EEDomain,name=Manager
|> javax.management.NotCompliantMBeanException: Getter
|> isStateManageable cannot
|> co-
|> exist with getter getStateManageable
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.Introspector.testConsistency(Introspector.java
|> :328)
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.Introspector.introspect(Introspector.java:264)
|>
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.Introspector.testCompliance(Introspector.java:
|> 134)
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.MetaData.testCompliance(MetaData.java:132)
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.createMBean(MBeanServerImpl.ja
|> va:759)
|>         at
|org.jboss.system.ServiceCreator.install(ServiceCreator.java:94)
|>         at
|> org.jboss.system.ServiceController.install(ServiceController.java:152
|> )
|>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
|>         at
|> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
|> java:39)
|>         at
|> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
|> sorImpl.java:25)
|>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:16
|> 28)
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:15
|> 23)
|>         at org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.invoke(SARDeployer.java:725)
|>         at org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.deploy(SARDeployer.java:216)
|>         at
|org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:389)
|>         at
|org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:360)
|>         at
|org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:344)
|>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
|>         at
|> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
|> java:39)
|>         at
|> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
|> sorImpl.java:25)
|>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:16
|> 28)
|>         at
|> com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:15
|> 23)
|>         at org.jboss.system.Server.<init>(Server.java:151)
|>         at org.jboss.Main.boot(Main.java:208)
|>         at org.jboss.Main.run(Main.java:44)
|>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)
|>
|> ----- Original Message -----
|> From: "Adrian Brock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:24 AM
|> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 is official
|>
|>
|> > There was a problem in the beta for jmxri.jar and
|> > SingleJBoss. Maybe this has been fixed?
|> >
|> > On a similar note, the proposed final draft for
|> > JSR88 (j2ee app deployment api) came out yesterday.
|> >
|> > Regards,
|> > Adrian
|> >
|> > > Well, in case no one pays attention to Sun's site.
|> > >
|> > > JDK 1.4.0 has been made official
|> > > (Linux/Solaris/Windows).
|> > >
|> > > I saw a bunch of patches a while ago to fix naming
|> > > problems for JDK 1.4
|> > > (assert), did those ever get fixed?
|> > >
|> > > Does JBoss work on 1.4 currently?
|> > >
|> > > -David
|> > >
|> > >
|> > >
|> > > _______________________________________________
|> > > Jboss-development mailing list
|> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-dev
|> > > lopment
|> >
|> >
|> >
|> > _________________________________________________________
|> > View thread online:
|> http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=8500
|> >
|> > _______________________________________________
|> > Jboss-development mailing list
|> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Jboss-development mailing list
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to