For the record, I was not planning on doing anythign about this.... just had a thought and wanted to know what others thought... just in case anyone is nervous that tomorrow there will be log4j metric logging everywhere... cause there won't.
If JMX notifications work like they do in the previous email I replied to on this, then cool. Perhaps a MetricSupport object could be added to make less verbose... --jason David Jencks wrote: >JMX notifications >david > >On 2002.02.24 00:49:38 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: > >>I was thinking that logging would be less intrusive and easier for folks >>to enable/disable when then wish... though I agree that JMX would be >>better. >> >>Can you think of a way to allow this to be enabled/disabled and have >>little effect on performance (on or off) with JMX? >> >>--jason >> >> >>David Jencks wrote: >> >>>On 2002.02.24 00:13:41 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: >>> >>>>Any thoughts about adding a new priority/level for logging stats and >>>>metrics? >>>> >>>I'd say no, this should be done through jmx not logging. >>> >>>david jencks >>> >>>>--jasin >>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Jboss-development mailing list >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >>>> >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Jboss-development mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >>> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Jboss-development mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Jboss-development mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
