It isn't worth the trouble for users to have to and hack all of the third partly war libs like struts which use the Class.forName construct. The stack trace here is expected as delegation to the parent won't find the class. The question is why is it printed, because Jetty can't find the jars in WEB-INF/lib? The jbosstest-web.ear class loader dump shows that Jetty is including any WEB-INF/lib jars in its classpath.
----- Original Message ----- From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:22 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] More Ear crap .. > scott, > > I am going to look at this and try and re-establish this behavior (we parse > the files).. > > we can support 2.3 behavior. Straigh Class.forName is a bug. In this case > the previous code would have worked. > > marcf > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott > |M Stark > |Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:22 PM > |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] More Ear crap .. > | > | > |The org.mortbay.http.ContextLoader.loadClass should be > |handling jars in WEB-INF/lib. The stack trace is for the > |org.mortbay.http.ContextLoader calling its parent class loader > |which will not have any knowledge of the WEB-INF/lib jars. > |The current jbosstest-web.ear includes jars in WEB-INF/lib > |and these are picked up correctly. Servlets are loaded from > |WEB-INF/classes so a test of loading servlets from a WEB-INF/lib > |jar needs to be added. > | > |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > |Scott Stark > |Chief Technology Officer > |JBoss Group, LLC > |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > |----- Original Message ----- > |From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > |To: "Dave Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > |<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > |Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 6:32 PM > |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] More Ear crap .. > | > | > |> take it out of webinf > |> > |> marcf > |> > |> |-----Original Message----- > |> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave > |> |Smith > |> |Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 3:13 PM > |> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> |Subject: [JBoss-dev] More Ear crap .. > |> | > |> | > |> |Ok what is the currennt status of the ear deployment in the latest head? > |> |I am using a hacked version of cactus where I replaced Class.forName() > |> |with Thread.currentThread.getContextClassLoader().loadClass(). My ear > |> |looks like > |> | > | > | > | > |_______________________________________________ > |Jboss-development mailing list > |[EMAIL PROTECTED] > |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
