I believe that his idea would still require a JBoss specific dd, but I 
could be wrong.  Once that work starts moving then I will bring this up 
again... unless I forget.

--jason


marc fleury wrote:

>David's got an even better idea 
>
>marcf
>
>|-----Original Message-----
>|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
>|Dillon
>|Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:29 PM
>|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss.xml vs. jboss-ejb-jar.xml
>|
>|
>|Quick idea.  Use jboss-ejb-jar.xml instead of jboss.xml to avoid 
>|confusion with other jboss xml config files...
>|
>|--jason
>|
>|
>|_______________________________________________
>|Jboss-development mailing list
>|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jboss-development mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>



_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to