On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, marc fleury wrote: > |But we don't have an "abstract" EJB/ProxyFactory... > > my point is that we could... at least for the java client parts
Yes, I understand you clearly today. > |The EJB/JRMP/ProxyFactory does not care about the IIOP invoker. > |And the EJB/IIOP/ProxyFactory does not care about the JRMP invoker. > | > |See what I mean? > > yes in the case of C clients where you generate (whatever it is that you > generate) but for Java clients, we can abstract that Invoker away . Right. Now I recall that your ProxyFactory works with any wire prococol, as long as there is a Java client at the other side. ( Quite impressive piece of software, BTW! ) Anyway, we still need to support wire protocols that do not presume an all-Java world. Not only for the sake of IIOP and the Sun certification stuff. SOAP/JBoss.net raises the very same issues. Cheers, Francisco _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
