on 07-04-2 09.30, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If one uses ones own ServerSocket and connection threads that use the >> hsqldb.Database class directly - then We do not need to touch the hsqldb >> code and have more controll over the listeners in JBoss ... this is how the >> Avalon project has solved there embedded hsqldb. > > Does it make sence to implement this now, incase the method the hsqldb folks > decide on isn't enough... or takes too long?
I think they will provide us with something satisfactory ... > Do you understand how to implement this? If so and it makes sence to add, > then lets do it. It will make this more maintainable. Doing a plain Jane implementation is easy - unless You use the JNP way as a pattern for doing it ;-) ... It growed on me to be able to have all listerners (NAME:PORT) registred in a component for easy access by other components, to be able to understand what ports are running in the WM and be JMX intra-machine negotiation capable. what do You think ? ... /peter_f _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
