What?  How does JBoss.NET get in there?  Really, I don't get how you come up 
with these things sometimes. 

JBoss.NET is not accessable from this component... since JBoss.NET is itself 
deployed here.

I would have to be a JMX notification, which you could then install an 
JBoss.NET adapter or whatever if you like, but the core system can not make 
use of it directly.

--jason


Quoting Peter Fagerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> on 15-04-2 02.10, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > On 2002.04.14 19:44:06 -0400 Peter Fagerlund wrote:
> >> on 15-04-2 01.24, Larry Sanderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> 
> >>> I don't know... perhaps someone would like to add a custom layer of
> >> security
> >>> on all deployments.  Perhaps they would like to get an email when new
> >>> deployments occur.  Who knows?  The point is I can see no down-side to
> >>> making this pluggable, and it is a very easy patch. More important,
> >> though,
> >>> is to prevent SubDeployers from accessing MainDeployer specific
> >>> functionality.  That is just bad design.
> >> 
> >> It is of interest to have a "notification" of deploys when the thought
> >> frame is agent centric.
> > 
> > The farm service runs off of such notifications today.  Possibly they
> could
> > be finer grained or at a different time.
> 
> maybe as a jboss.net "notification" then since in in a agent frame no
> config
> nor geo boundery should prevent ? ...
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> 




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to