OK maybe some of the configuration of Jetty in JBoss will be useful after all...
After all I said about their configuration language... jules please advise marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jules |Gosnell |Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:09 PM |To: Sacha Labourey |Cc: Jboss-Dev |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployment and config: one more thing, port |numbers. | | |Jetty has a useful construct in it's xml config. | |You can use something like: | |<arg> | <SystemProperty name="jetty.home"default="./">/config/jetty.xml |</arg> | |Jetty expands all SystemProperty tags accordingly. | |If we supported some such construct, users could choose what they wanted |to externalise (or override) with a properties file. | | | |Jules | | | |Sacha Labourey wrote: |> Hello, |> |> As the deployer/config issue is very hot these days, I want to add oil on |> the fire ;) |> |> I see an interest in setting port numbers in an external config |file (le'ts |> say parameters.xml or port.xml, whatever). |> |> Then we would reference this file from our jboss-services.xml |files instead |> of disseminating port configuration everywhere in 8 XML files and 3 SARs. |> Furthermore (and you will understand why I propose this), if you |want to run |> 2 JBoss instances on the same IP address, configuration becomes |a headache. |> |> Feel free to complain loudly. |> |> Cheers, |> |> |> Sacha |> |> |> _______________________________________________ |> Jboss-development mailing list |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development |> | | | | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
