... and runs _only_ on SUSE linux 8-) bax ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francisco Reverbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:12 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] YAJI (Yet Another JBoss Invoker)
> Hi, > > I am also playing with a new invoker. Well, not really new... It is > actually the JRMP invoker code, with just a few changes to sent the > Invocation over IIOP rather than JRMP. In the lack of a better name, > I am calling it JavaIIOPInvoker. > > JavaIIOPInvoker is quite different from the plain IIOPInvoker. It is also > much simpler. By way of comparison: > > - IIOPInvoker allows IIOP access to the actual interfaces of deployed > beans. When a client calls create() on an EJBHome, an IIOP request with > operation name "create" goes over the wire and is handled by the > plain IIOPInvoker. > > - JavaIIOPInvoker allow IIOP acess to a single interface: Invoker, which > essentially has a single operation, invoke(). When a client class > create() on an EJBHome, an IIOP request with operation name "invoke" > goes over the wire and is handled by the JavaIIOPInvoker. Info on the > actual method to be invoked (create(), in this case) goes within the > Invocation parameter to invoke(). > > Unlike IIOPInvoker, which uses an IORFactory, JavaIIOPInvoker works with > the "standard" JBoss ProxyFactory. Whan a client gets a reference to an > EJBHome or EJBObject, it really gets a serialized Java proxy, just like > in the JRMP case. The only difference is that this proxy's delegate has > a CORBA reference (IOR) to the JavaIIOPInvoker, instead of a RMI/JRMP > reference to the JRMPInvoker. Everything else works (or should work) as > in the JRMP case: interceptors, client container, transactions, etc. > > JavaIIOPInvoker is useless to non-Java clients (hence its name). I am > interested in comparing it with the JRMPInvoker WRT performance. So far > (a simple hello test) I got pretty much the same numbers... Of course, > the performance may change with the ORB used. I am doing everything > with JacORB. > > Should I commit this stuff? Right now I am not really sure if it will > be useful or not. > > Cheers, > > Francisco > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
