Keep it at 1_0 I think. Neither branch has actually been released yet;-) Thanks for writing this and I'm glad you can commit it now!!
david jencks On 2002.08.19 07:43:26 -0400 Michael Bartmann wrote: > Hi, > last week (before gaining cvs-write-privilege) I submitted > a patch (nr. 595176) which allows you to use no-tx-datasources > via xsl-deployment. > I would really like to commit this into Branch_3_2 and HEAD, > and everything is obviously upwards-compatible. > > But: should the upwards-compatible DTD stay at version 1_0 > or should it be called1_1 or such? > > Enjoy, > Michael > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
