these are invokers yes, but they are not RMI re-implementations. marc f
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Hiram Chirino > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 8:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Unwrapping exceptions in client proxy > > > > > > > This is just another reason to get rid of the lame Sun RMI > > > implementation (JBoss 4.0). In the meantime, I agree that we > > > > we are not there yet, > > You guys talking about replacing RMI for the remote EJB > invocations?? Isn't that what we have the JBoss.IIOP and > JBoss.Net projects?? > > Regards, > Hiram > > > > > > (you) will > > > need to make patched to the unwrapping code. > > > > let's do the workaround > > > > marc f > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > In remembrance > > www.osdn.com/911/ _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > In remembrance > www.osdn.com/911/ _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- In remembrance www.osdn.com/911/ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
