The question is not should but can? :-) The spec requires the MBeanServer to invoke the ModelMBean's pre/post[De]Register. It is silent on whether the ModelMBean forwards that to the "pojo".
The pojo implementing the interface should be enough configuration shouldn't it? Regards, Adrian >From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: jboss-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [JBoss-dev] Should modelmbean forward MBeanRegistration calls to >managed resource? >Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 00:35:23 -0400 > >I think it's an oversight... shouldn't modelMbean forward the >MBeanRegistration calls to the managed resource if that resource implements >MBeanRegistration? > >Our ServiceMBeanSupport subclasses need these calls to get the server and >their objectName. I've added this so subclasses can be xmbeans. Should >this be configurable by descriptors? > >Thanks >david jencks > > >------------------------------------------------------- >Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! >Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer >Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab >_______________________________________________ >Jboss-development mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
