I has to be restricted for CMP 2.0 beans as the code assumes that the name is a valid java identifier.
-dain Scott M Stark wrote: > [x ] <ejb-name> should be restricted as above ONLY for CMP 2.0 Entity Beans > There really is no point to restricting the names in other contexts that I can see > as it will only introduce compatibility problems. > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christian Riege" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "JBoss Dev list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 4:29 AM > Subject: [JBoss-dev] Restricting <ejb-name> values > > > >>Hi everyone, >> >>I'm currently working on resolving Bug #613360 (see >>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=613360&group_id=22866 ). >> >>I have an implementation issue with the EJB Spec Section 10.6.14: >> >>"The Bean Provider should not use reserved identifiers as ejb-names or >>abstract-schema-names. Reserved identifiers are discussed in Section >>11.2.6.1." >> >>Even more restrictive is section 10.3.13: >> >>"The ejb-name must be a valid Java identifier" >> >>This explicitly disallows something which is quite popular today, e.g. >> >><ejb-name>org/jboss/ABean</ejb-name> >> >>Thus possibly a lot of deployments will break. >> >>If you take the spec literally this only applies to CMP 2.0 Entity Beans >>(the other sections don't talk about <ejb-name> element a lot, the DTD >>only talks about <ejb-name> being restricted to the XML 1.0 'NMTOKEN' >>specification). >> >>I need a handcount as to how restrictive should JBoss be, please check >>one of the options below: >> >>[ ] <ejb-name> should be restricted as specified above for ALL EJB's > > >>My vote is to enforce these restrictions for ALL beans. A lot easier to >>implement and it has the advantage of being consistent throughout JBoss. >>Consistency is a Good Thing(tm). >> >>Regards + thanks for your input, >>Christian > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect JBossCMP JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
