Do we still need the hacked version with the latest release of HSQLDB? If not lets drop the hacked version and just integrate what they release.
If not, then lets get a fix into the HSQLDB sources so they are more embeddable. --jason > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Bartmann > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] sources for hsqldb (LEAK FOUND) > > viktor wrote: > > > > onsdagen den 25 september 2002 kl 20.43 skrev Michael Bartmann: > > > >> What is the best way to change the codebase? Another > >> patch for hsqldb? > >> > > > > Commit something that works optimised ... is the "best way"... > > > > After running the testsuit that is ... > > > > :-) ... > > > > /peter_f > > > > PS: test and debug hsqldb 1.7.0 integration would be optimal :DS > > > My question concerning "best way" was more a technical one; there > are two sf.net projects involved. The build process of the patched > hsqldb jar is not part of the jboss build. > > A possible answer might be: > > 0) test... > 1) post patch to hsqldb (as source) > 2) build the modified jar in your garage (as binary) > 3) commit the jar to Branch_X of jboss cvs > > Regards, > Michael Bartmann > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
