Ok, but should the lifecycle of the interceptors be the same as the lifecycle of the bean? Right now a service is an mbean that is available through the jmx-console indepedenent of its JBoss service lifecycle notion. How is that going to change if the dependency is embedded into the interceptors?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:23 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EJB's as Xmbeans? > I want to remove the current anomoly that calling say start on an mbean > directly bypasses the dependency checking whereas calling > ServiceController.start(mbeanName) does the dependency checking. Putting > the ServiceContext and dependency checking code in an interceptor will do > this. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
