See my responses online at www.jboss.org we need to start breaking down the development and letting people get in our development in a more transparent fashion.
> 1. Interceptors do not belong in the JMX layer. JMX should > stay simple. If you want interceptors in front of an MBean, > you should make the MBean an aspect. Let's gut out the JMX > interceptors in favor of using Hiram's Aspect stuff when its > mature enough. Agreed. > 2. I really don't like this idea of storing state in some > detached hashmap somewhere. You're getting back to > functional programing with structures and functions. I agree > with Marc, hashmap.getvalue is just plain unreadable as well. Yes and no. I argue these online in response to your thread. marc f ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
