JMX is not what is important, its the microkernel and services on top of it.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 8:25 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JMX on the client side? > > > > Hiram, I think you missed the point. Of course we could do this with > > out requiring JMX; anything is possible. The point is if we agree that > > JMX is always on the client side then entire system is simplified. > > > > I guess the disconnect is happening right here. IMO JMX does not always > make things easier. What do you think JMX provides that would simplify "the > entire system"? Is it: > (1) Runtime server administration > (2) Service creation/configuration/lookup. > > Even though those are super important on the server side, I just don't see > how important those would be on the client side. Am I missing something > else? > > Regards, > Hiram ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
