Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote: > Anyways. JMS need bi-directional invocations (BADLY). Should this > become a requirement for the other invokers??I completely disagree. There is no reason server to client communication has to go over the back channel of a client to serverI might have said this before, but there is one reason it's a nice feature: This allows callback to clients that are sitting behind a firewall.
Yes but it should not be required.
This is why I want jmx on the client side. We should be able to use any of our invokers for the back channel (unless there is a firewall).invoker. It is a nice feature but should not be a requirement. For example, I may want a system that uses RMI for client to server and Juxta for server to client. To me it is just another RPC. This is why I want JMX on the client side, so I can reuse any invoker for the server to client (or client to client) communication.Yep.. I guess that's what I'm complaining about. I want to have invokers on the client side too. I want JMS call backs to go via an invoker too. I can't do that today because we don't do client side invokers.
-dain
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
