What
I'm saying is, why add this complication? Do we really need it?
KISS.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Hiram Chirino
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing since sliced breadHow about implementing some kind of seperate interceptor framwork around the client side and server side invocation layers??
David, if yoiu had a configurable way to plug in your tx interceptors at the invocation layer you would be ok right? I think david just needs to avoid duplicating the code that is in the trunk invoker all over the place.
Bill, how doable is that?
Regards,
HiramBill Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO, CORE client interceptors such as security and tx should be written
such that if the client doesn't support interceptors (C++) you don't break
the server side or put additional configuration requirements on the server
side.
Bill
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more