> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_0.dtd vs jboss_3_2.dtd
>
> ...
> the enterprise-beans element model would have to be:
> <!ELEMENT enterprise-beans (session | entity | message-driven)*>
> content model for backward compability and consistency with the
> ejb-jar 2.0 DTD.
Done.
> The ordering of the jboss child elements should also be
> consistent between 3.0 and 3.2. I think the jboss element
> content model in 3.2 needs to be:
>
> <!ELEMENT jboss (enforce-ejb-restrictions?, security-domain?,
> unauthenticated-principal?, resource-managers?,
> enterprise-beans?, invoker-proxy-bindings?,
> container-configurations?)>
>
> as this is consistent with the invoker-proxy-bindings and
> container-configurations ordering in the standardjboss.xml
> descriptor and is consistent with the
> 3.0 element ordering.
3.2 standardjboss.xml has form:
<invoker-proxy-bindings>
...
</invoker-proxy-bindings>
<enforce-ejb-restrictions>false</enforce-ejb-restrictions>
<container-configurations>
...
</container-configurations>
So, that content model doesn't match the 3.2 dtd. Plus, the 3.0 dtd has
resource-managers after enterprise-beans, so, I'm not sure how it's
consistent with the 3.0 content model?
How about:
<!ELEMENT jboss (enforce-ejb-restrictions?, security-domain?,
unauthenticated-principal?, enterprise-beans?,
resource-managers?, invoker-proxy-bindings?,
container-configurations?)>
And, I'll fix the standardjboss.xml file in 3.2 and HEAD to move
enforce-ejb-restrictions above all the invoker-proxy-bindings.
What do you think?
Michael
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing.
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
