At least the copy in HEAD is actually for xdoclet 1.2. When I migrated HEAD to xdoclet 1.2 I basically ignored the jboss.net xdoclet task. I'd say if the testsuite is OK, it is safe to ignore and let the jboss.net folks fix if there is a problem later.
thanks david jencks On 2003.03.20 17:44 Stephen Coy wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was > being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger > anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in > org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in > Branch_3_2, but I can't see any actual uses of it in build files. > > Th reason I ask is that I'm currently migrating Branch_3_2 to xdoclet > 1.2, and I'm not sure what to do with the jboss.net stuff. > > Steve Coy > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Tablet PC. > Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. > Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
