Both reference and ObjectName are comliant with the spec, so this makes
sense.
I just made the change and wanted to run some tests with the latest
Branch_3_2, but am having problems deploying jbossweb-tomcat41.sar ... Will
need some more time to see what is wrong before I commit the change.
-=Ivelin=-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Clustering and AttributeChangeNotification
> The problem is the MBean instance, not the attribute value and requiring
the
> MBean implementation to be Serializable is not realistic. I'm not finding
a
> clear statement of why the AttributeChangeNotification should use the
MBean
> instance as the source of the notification sent out vs the ObjectName,
which
> seems preferrable as you do not enter into this dance of deciding what the
type
> of source is depending on what layer is dealing with the notification.
>
> The MBeanServer impl imposes a
org.jboss.mx.server.NotificationListenerProxy
> which unconditionally overwrites the callback notification source with the
> ObjectName the listener is interested in. The HAServiceMBeanSupport can do
the
> same as the sender must be the 'this' service.
>
> public void sendNotification(Notification notification)
> {
> try
> {
> notification.setSource(this.getServiceName());
> sendNotificationRemote(notification);
> }
> catch (Throwable th)
> {
> boolean debug = log.isDebugEnabled();
> if (debug)
> log.debug("sendNotificationRemote( " + notification + " ) failed
", th);
> // even if broadcast failed, local notification should still be
sent
>
> }
> sendNotificationToLocalListeners( notification );
> }
>
> --
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I implemented tests and example classes, which work in clustered
> > environment,
> > but they were apparently using serializable objects.
> > I was thinking that it would be sufficien to document this requirement.
> > How can "this" be replaced with ObjectName generically by
> > HAServiceMBeanSupport?
> >
> > -=Ivelin=-
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
>
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-Development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
