Bill
Francisco Reverbel wrote:
Actually my rant was not well founded. Just run all IIOP tests on on HEAD (fresh checkout), with no errors.
I don't understand why there were IIOP errors in the results Tom posted. (Perhaps his server run with the "default" config, rather than with the "all" config?)
Cheers,
Francisco
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Tom Elrod wrote:
Per request, I am going to wait an extra day before doing commit. Am also assuming that the post below is not an objection to the commit, but a well founded rant.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Francisco Reverbel Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 4:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX DR3 rollback commit
Guys,
The test results Tom posted show IIOP tests failing on HEAD. I understand this is not his fault, as his changes were not yet merged into HEAD when the tests were run. Anyway, I've fixed IIOP in HEAD less than a month ago. All IIOP tests were running with no errors back then.
<rant> I'm tired of chasing errors before doing IIOP work on HEAD. </rant>
Cheers,
Francisco
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Tom Elrod wrote:
Hello all. I have been working on bringing in the source
code from the jmx
project from the Branch_4_0_DR3 into HEAD. This is needed
since it is
compliant with JMX 1.2, which is needed for some of the
other modules (like
JMX Remoting). Everything under the jmx directory will be
updated, except
the mx.loading module, which will remain the same as what
is in HEAD now. In
the process of migrating this code, many other classes had
to be changed
outside the jmx project, so that they would use any new API.
I have run the testsuite (along with many other tests) to
makes sure I did
not break anything in the process. However, there is too
much to be able to
go through all the different modules. In general, the test
results seem to
reflect that not much (if anything) has been broken (see
below) due to the
change.
I plan on committing all the code tomorrow (Monday) night
around 11pm EST.
Please review the following test results and verify I did
not break anything
significant in your module. You can follow the links at
the bottom to get
details on the exact tests that failed. In the following
results, the repos
named 'rollback' is the one that I have made the changes to
and thus the one
to be most aware of. Please let me know if there is
something that needs to
be corrected before I perform the commit tomorrow. BTW,
there are not
currently test results for 'rollback' on Linux, so that is
why it is not
filled in yet.
Thanks.
-Tom
Windows 2000
\build\build.bat clean most
Source Repos Test Results Branch_4_0_DR3 success HEAD success rollback success
\jmx\build.bat test-compliance-full-JBossMX test-implementation test-performance-JBossMX test-serialization test-stress-JBossMX
Source Repos Test Target Test Results Branch_4_0_DR3 test-compliance-full-JBossMX Tests
run: 926, Failures: 4,
Errors: 2 HEAD test-compliance-full-JBossMX Tests run: 706,
Failures: 3, Errors: 0
rollback test-compliance-full-JBossMX Tests run: 926,
Failures: 4, Errors:
2 Branch_4_0_DR3 test-implementation Tests run: 67,
Failures: 1, Errors: 1
HEAD test-implementation OK (37 tests) rollback test-implementation Tests run: 67,
Failures: 1, Errors: 1
Branch_4_0_DR3 test-performance-JBossMX OK (14 tests) HEAD test-performance-JBossMX OK (11 tests) rollback test-performance-JBossMX OK (14 tests) Branch_4_0_DR3 test-serialization Tests run: 93,
Failures: 1, Errors: 0
HEAD test-serialization Tests run: 93,
Failures: 0, Errors: 90
rollback test-serialization Tests run: 93,
Failures: 1, Errors: 1
Branch_4_0_DR3 test-stress-JBossMX OK (1 tests) HEAD test-stress-JBossMX OK (1 test) rollback test-stress-JBossMX OK (1 test)
\testsuite\build.bat tests
Source Repos Test Failures Errors Success
rate Time
Branch_4_0_DR3 847 13 480 41.79% 5817.237 HEAD 733 54 304 51.16% 1687.185 rollback 718 62 308 48.47 1656.592
Linux - Red Hat 7.3
\build\build.sh clean most
Source Repos Test Results Branch_4_0_DR3 success HEAD success rollback
\jmx\build.sh test-compliance-full-JBossMX test-implementation test-performance-JBossMX test-serialization test-stress-JBossMX
Source Repos Test Target Test Results Branch_4_0_DR3 test-compliance-full-JBossMX Tests
run: 926, Failures: 4,
Errors: 2 HEAD test-compliance-full-JBossMX Tests run: 706,
Failures: 3, Errors: 0
rollback test-compliance-full-JBossMX Branch_4_0_DR3 test-implementation Tests run: 67,
Failures: 1, Errors: 1
HEAD test-implementation OK (37 tests) rollback test-implementation Branch_4_0_DR3 test-performance-JBossMX OK (14 tests) HEAD test-performance-JBossMX OK (11 tests) rollback test-performance-JBossMX Branch_4_0_DR3 test-serialization Tests run: 93,
Failures: 1, Errors: 0
HEAD test-serialization Tests run: 93,
Failures: 0, Errors: 90
rollback test-serialization Branch_4_0_DR3 test-stress-JBossMX OK (1 tests) HEAD test-stress-JBossMX OK (1 test) rollback test-stress-JBossMX
\testsuite\build.sh tests
Source Repos Test Failures Errors Success
rate Time
Branch_4_0_DR3 850 12 479 42.24% 3711.145 HEAD 777 57 331 50.06% 1779.778 rollback
The complete testsuite test results can be found at the
following links.
Windows:
HEAD -
http://e2technologies.net/projects/jboss/test/results/windows/
HEAD/html/
Branch_4_0_DR3 -
http://e2technologies.net/projects/jboss/test/results/windows/Branch_4_0_DR3
/html/ rollback -
http://e2technologies.net/projects/jboss/test/results/windows/rollback/html/
Linux:
HEAD -
http://e2technologies.net/projects/jboss/test/results/linux/Branch_4_0_DR3/h
tml/ Branch_4_0_DR3 -
http://e2technologies.net/projects/jboss/test/results/linux/Branch_4_0_DR3/h
tml/
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
-- ================ Bill Burke Chief Architect JBoss Group LLC. ================
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
