View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3821237#3821237
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3821237 cool - thanks for that explination. i definately see the value in using the dynamic proxy. i just don't have a lot of experience using them, hence my question. it may be better in the long run to have the Support modules implement the interfaces b/c it would help clear up any confusion on where the implementation comes from, and also guarentee that both classes are kept in sync for new method additions. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
