I added your comment to the forums.
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3824602#3824602
It seems jboss-dev does not accept posts with jboss-dev in copy?
Regards,
Adrian
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 15:53, Bill Burke wrote:
> I was also hoping that you could supply a mixin class that handled
> service lifecycle so that POJO's could be involved with lifecycle and
> not have to implement any interface.
>
> Hmmmm, I guess you could do this with AOP introduction.
>
> Bill
>
> Scott M Stark wrote:
>
> > The state machine was not immeadiately for the service layer, but
> > will be used to enforce illegal transitions if we decide on a state
> > diagram.
> >
> > The suggested change makes sense, but the other problem is the fact
> > that the deployment layer is out of the loop in this. I would like
> > to couple dependency and life cycle to delay the creation of the
> > service as an mbean, but have not really looked at how big a change
> > this is.
> >
> > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Scott Stark
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > JBoss Group, LLC
> > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Adrian Brock
> >>Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 5:24 PM
> >>To: Scott M Stark
> >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Core
> >>Subject: Service Lifecyle confusions - potential fix
> >>
> >>Hi Scott,
> >>
> >>Are you working on the Service lifecycle?
> >>I saw you replaced common's state machine implementation.
> >>
> >>I was thinking that there should be an extra indirection to
> >>avoid the confusion caused by people clicking stop() and
> >>other operations in the console where dependencies are not
> >>taken into account.
> >>
> >>My idea is that you implement an extra operation in
> >>ServiceMBeanSupport
> >>
> >>public void jbossServiceLifecylce(String operation) throws
> >>Exception { if (operation.equals("create")) { // the current
> >>create() method } etc.
> >>}
> >>
> >>This would be invoked from ServiceController.ServiceProxy
> >>when it is implemented by the MBean.
> >>
> >>This would allow us to change the current
> >>ServiceMBeanSupport.create() to be:
> >>serviceController.create(serviceName);
> >>etc.
> >>
> >>Now clicking stop() in the console goes via the service
> >>controller making sure dependencies are also stopped.
> >>
> >>This doesn't fix the problem for MBeans that do not extend
> >>ServiceMBeanSupport. These would still do the old behaviour.
> >>Similar changes would be required to
> >>ServiceDynamicMBeanSupport and the XMBean descriptor include.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Adrian
> >>
> >>--
> >>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Adrian Brock
> >>Director of Support
> >>Back Office
> >>JBoss Inc.
> >>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Inc.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
