Laurent, those ideas sound great and I'm definitely up for at least some parts of the prototype.
Now that I think about it, with JBoss aspects being Java classes, your nature statement makes perfect sense. I mostly had debugging on my mind for that suggestion - particularly whether or not a precompile would be mandatory to stay in sync w/ the server's (potentially) dynamic classes. Fascinating stuff, but probably for further down the road. Ok, to get a p.o.c. off the ground, can I assume a simple 4.x delegate should be created? More random ideas/observations: -- jboss-aop.xml versioning would probably come in handy. -- It might be necessary to somehow preserve the non-tagged (demand) aspect assignments when x-doclet is run (guessing a merge dir. approach?). -- There's potential for x-doclet to not be used at all.. Make sense? Comments/suggestions? thanks. -oz <a href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3827635#3827635";>View the original post</a> <a href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3827635>Reply to the post</a> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
