I understand there is the beginning of work on implementing the portlet spec (or at least talking about it). Once portlet support is added, is the plan to move all the modules/blocks to portlets?
I understand there has been discussion about priorities, but I need to understand the vision and direction of Nukes. If it is to be a JSR 168 container with everything supported that way (and if necessary, some controlled extensions if necessary as specs are sometimes not sufficient), or is the JSR 168 support seen as just an add on and not core? I'm asking because if it aligns with my goals, I'm interested in helping. In other words... If I helped with portlet spec impl, and I helped with refactoring modules to portlets, would that be welcome and desired help or considered a nuisance? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829440#3829440 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3829440 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
