Bela, thanks for your quick response. I had one more question regarding the atomicity of the put(...) call. Can I assume put on a JGroups replicated object would have the same semantics as a local collection with respect to concurrency, i.e. is it guaranteed that in the event of a concurrent put by two different JVMs the return value will reflect the previous value in synchronized order? I assume this is the case and I do not need to use transactions?
Thanks, Thomas View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3845913#3845913 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3845913 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
