Thanks. I can imagine changing the behaviour now would hurt many people. I wonder if it's a optional setting that could be implemented?
Anyway, I am thinking of placing a traditional synchronized(...) block initially so that no thread could ever read null. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854906#3854906 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854906 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
