"norbert" wrote : You are right, as of JBossCache 1.1 get(Fqn,Key) is actually only being called by the JUnit-testcases. In respect to TreeCache itself it's (yet) redundant. | | Instead of returning null your CacheLoader should return a prefilled Map of Key-Value-pairs when get(Fqn) is being called |
This is exactly NOT what I want to do. The table is way too large for being moved from the db to the cache and the individual entries are not guaranteed to be live either, which means that we would move unneccessary data from the db to the cache. Since the whole point is to cut down on the db accesses this does not make sense. Also, if data is added to the db then I would have to get the whole table again everytime I get a cache miss. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3856063#3856063 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3856063 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
