The namespace to factory service applies to this thread. The issue is externalization of the object factory from the jbossxb user (the code parsing the top level document).
I find it doubtful that namespaces can be converted to expected package names in the absence of an upfront code centric naming policy. So I suppose the package name for 'http://acme.com/schema/jboss' is 'com.acme.sechma.jboss'? As far as I'm concerned these are generally disconnected. So in the absence of defining wild card integration points, isn't there way to have a validatable composite document? Are multiple roots allowed? I don't think it should be an absolute requirement to have a schema in order to parse an xml fragment into an object graph. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3859847#3859847 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3859847 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
