Isn't that the JBossPOJO Server is really JBossAS 5 (over the JBoss MicroContainer), where there will be more freedom in combing components.
In this sense, why change name/version scheme? In which case a JBossPOJO server will be offered standalone and not be named JBossAS? If this is confusing to us, imagine how it'll be perceived by the users.. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3860730#3860730 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3860730 ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
