Actually, the ghost directories will be jmx and system jmx2 and system2 will become the new definitions.
I am not branch phobic. I like branches, but I don't like the idea of continously merging lots of branches. If there was something like bitkeeper's pull in cvs where you can "automatically" merge change sets and it remembers how you resolved conflicts it wouldn't be such a problem. I'll go with the jmx2/system2 idea for now and only create a branch if it becomes unmanageable, i.e. we see a need to do major modifications to other projects. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3860777#3860777 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3860777 ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
