That implementation was incomplete. It was also based on an older version of Bill's interceptors/proxy.
1) JMSException and log interceptors can be perVM in current aspect speak they hold not state. CloseInterceptor needs to be perInstance since it holds the flag as to whether the object is closing/closed. 2) IIRC, I had most of the object construction (except for the inital implementation object that was inside the ConnectionFactory bound into jndi) in the factory interceptor. 3) I only got as far as sending/receiving non-persistent messages. I don't think I even committed the receiving messages processing? I just wanted something to test the backend server and that the approach worked. Although the approach worked, I wouldn't do it exactly the way I did it in the prototype. There was a lot of hardwiring where I left some of the problems (like external interceptor stack configuration) until later. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3864846#3864846 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3864846 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
