Hello, we have tried both tcp and fc-fast. Tcp was significantly slower and as a result the replication ratio (relative share of objects in a cache received from other caches and not from local PUT) went down (which decreases the usefulness of the cache). FC-fast provided the fastest replication and is a good candidate for a production environment. However, I do not think that the network configuration has any bearing on the memory problem.
Regarding updates, each cache updates the cluster about 20 times per second (at every 1000 GET). I'll put together a simplified testbench (including our JBossCache wrapper class and the status class) for you. Can you point me to a location where I can submit the code package? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3867086#3867086 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3867086 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
