[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-620?page=history ]
Scott M Stark closed JBAS-620:
------------------------------
Resolution: Done
Fix Version: JBossAS-4.0.1 Final
JBossAS-3.2.7 Final
> Configuring RMI object ports
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-620
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-620
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Type: Feature Request
> Versions: JBossAS-3.2.6 Final
> Reporter: SourceForge User
> Assignee: Scott M Stark
> Fix For: JBossAS-4.0.1 Final, JBossAS-3.2.7 Final
>
>
> SourceForge Submitter: jovovich .
> For running JBoss behind a firewall, you can configure explicit RMI object
> ports instead of using the default anonymous ports. The only thing to do is
> to change RmiPort 0 in jboss-service.xml to an explicit port number.
> But there are two remote objects in JBoss which can not be configured:
> - org.jboss.tm.usertx.server.UserTransactionSessionFactoryImpl
> - org.jboss.tm.usertx.server.UserTransactionSessionImpl
> So you can't use UserTransactions for a JBoss behind a firewall currently. It
> would be nice if these remote objects can be configured with two explicit
> ports in the same way as the NamingService.
> /Tobias
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
