anonymous wrote : | If each deployer is updated to specify it's own suffix's and relative order there is also an issue regarding registering and unregistering the deployers as the list of suffixes is automatically updated. You wouldn't want the undepoyment of a deployer that supports the 'jar' suffix to remove the 'jar' suffix from the list as other deployers can still deploy it. |
This is not the case in the 4.0 architecture. The suffixes should form a disjoint set across the deployers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870999#3870999 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870999 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
