"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : The XADataSource should just be a factory, it should be the connections that are the | heavy weight objects. | I'd guess this is the usual "You don't pay for what you don't use" | philosophy that JBoss normally does.
I could also instantiate them lazily. But then I would have to keep initialization of data per datasource. As you said, datasources themselves don't look heavy weight. That's the reason for my question whether it's a big deal. It doesn't look to me as it is. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : It looks like the only change you made to the existing stuff was to make | the xa props a protected field, so I don't see why it would be problem backporting | to JBoss4 (assuming you didn't break the stylesheet :-). Not a problem at all. I just want to port less times if there are issues. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Do you have it documentated somewhere on the WIKI (as experimental)? | http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossJCA Will write something today or tomorrow. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : and add a subtask here: | http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1597 Yes, will do. The DTD already has ha-local elements. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3872192#3872192 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3872192 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
