Scott M Stark wrote:
I want to add a jbxb:schemaBindings/jbxb:IgnoreUnresolvedFieldOrClass
boolean element flag that mirrors the
SchemaBinding.setIgnoreUnresolvedFieldOrClass(boolean) method so this
can be set from the schema.
Ok
Does it also make sense for the value of
IgnoreUnresolvedFieldOrClass to be false rather than the current true? I
have run into problems in my schema not being reported due to the
default behavior of ignoring elements that don't map to a class and I'm
not clear on why ignoring is the correct default behavior.
I don't mind. The current behaviour was easier for me in debugging and
writting examples and tests.
Maybe it even makes sense to have three values: ignore silently, ignore
with a warning (current behaviour) and don't ignore.
alex
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Inc.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
