I would prefer you to maintain a single jbossxb version in HEAD with known binary drops in the repository that are then beeing used in 4.0.x. Otherwise I have little confidence that we will get retrotranslated versions of projects that depend on jbossxb (like JBossWS) working in 4.0.x
Currently, the build of module common in 4.0.x does not use the sources xml binding. IMHO, it'd be better to allocate the already scarce resources towards a binary solution drop like we have with remoting. The impact for customers should be minimal. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss Inc. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >-----Original Message----- >From: Alexey Loubyansky >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 11:27 >To: Thomas Diesler >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Sync xml tests with HEAD for use with jboss-xml-binding.jar > >Thomas, > >as I understood Scott we don't want to update jbossxb users in >jboss-4.x to use jbossxb from HEAD. The tests are supposed to >reflect the api and functionality used. So, I don't think the >tests from HEAD should be backported to branch 4. > >alex > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
