I still think we need a jmx object name alias registry to wean off of the objectnames to simple, purpose oriented names. This would have to be integrated as an aspect on top of the mbeanserver/registry.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Brock Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:59 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Bill Burke Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Guessing datasource name Perhaps we should just byte the bullet and fix this naming confusion? The problem is everybody's existing config that uses it. e.g. JMS and login-config.xml that reference these names. You can certainly "fix" the stylesheet and change this config in jbossjca-service.xml <mbean code="org.jboss.deployment.XSLSubDeployer" name="jboss.jca:service=ConnectionFactoryDeployer"> <attribute name="DdSuffix">-ds.xml</attribute> <attribute name="EnhancedSuffixes">300:-ds.xml</attribute> <attribute name="XslUrl">stylesheets/ConnectionFactoryTemplate.xsl</attribute> <attribute name="ValidateDTDs">false</attribute> </mbean> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
