On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 13:28, Scott M Stark wrote: > Let's do that. Do you want to couple this to maven? It would help Ruel I > suppose.
We may as well go "Big Bang!". :-) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adrian Brock > > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:34 AM > > To: Scott M Stark > > Cc: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; QA > > Subject: RE: Ongoing build changes: was RE: [JBoss-dev] > > OntheedgeoftheMaven cliff > > > > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:32, Scott M Stark wrote: > > > So we need to carve out a "minimal" impact strategy considering > > > projects that today are tied to the jbossas head cvs > > structure. Maybe > > > we need a nightly snapshot of jbossas in the repository with > > > redefinition of projects like ejb3 to decouple them during > > the transition. > > > > > > > I could certainly create a branch where we could initially > > measure the impact of the combined Maven/common changes. > > > > The main issue being the circularity dependencies across > > common which aren't visible with everything in one project. > > -- > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Adrian Brock > > Chief Scientist > > JBoss Inc. > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss Inc. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
