As a part of 5:

backport-concurrent and jbossretro-rt are both needed in

1. The client dir
2. server/all/lib

Correct?

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Brock 
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 7:03 AM
To: jboss-development
Cc: QA
Subject: Re: JBossRetro, JBossWS and JDK1.4

I missed one

1a) Tag and release JBossRetro

On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 12:59 +0000, Adrian Brock wrote:
> Let's move this discussion here so we make sure everybody 
> is "on the same page".
> 
> I want to get this done before 4.0.4CR2
> so the community has a chance to test it,
> rather than dumping it on them in a final release.
> 
> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBBUILD-188
> 
> We need to come up with a roadmap to define who is doing what.
> 
> The tasks that need are:
> 
> 1) Tag concurrent in our cvs repository
> The only change since I imported it (tag=BUC_2_1)
> is to add an ant script to build and run tests.
> I'd suggest something like JBoss_BUC_2_1
> 
> 2) Get a Javassist release with the 
> lastest annotation fixes.
> This is only necessary when purge=true
> but purge=true is very desirable for memory reasons.
> 
> 3) Update buildmagic to provide the retro and retrocheck
> tasks to all projects (if they desire it)
> 
> 4) Use it in JBossWS in jboss-head
> 
> 5) Backport to JBoss4 the 
> * JBossRetro runtime classes
> * JBossWS binaries 
> * javassist
> * backport-concurrent-util
> 
> 6) Test it in JBoss4 with JDK1.4
-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss Inc.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to