| Whether these components are shipped with the AS binary | distribution is one aspect,
was already agreed: jbpm will not be in the jboss download. | whether they have automated | integration tests is another. The latter is a MUST. was already agreed. | Our testsuite has the ability to create specialized jboss | configurations, start/stop these configurations and run tests | in those configurations. Currently we are working on creating such a configuration in testsuite/build-thirdparty.xml. I still have to take a closer look into the jboss test suite(s?). | Every component that is expected to work in the AS should | have automated integration tests. An integration test is a | test that checks whether stuff that you depend on works in | the way you expect. How you setup fuctional tests for your | component is up to you. agreed as well. regards, tom. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +32 14 880 900 | -----Original Message----- | From: Thomas Diesler | Sent: zaterdag 25 maart 2006 9:44 | To: Alejandro Guizar; Chris Laprun; Tom Baeyens | Cc: Julien Viet; Dev - JBossWS; | jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net | Subject: RE: wsrp integration | | > [...]/jbpm/bpel and [...]/portal/wsrp seem fine to me | | Yes, that's fine. | | > neither Portal nor jBPM is an integral component of the Appserver. | | Whether these components are shipped with the AS binary | distribution is one aspect, whether they have automated | integration tests is another. The latter is a MUST. | | Our testsuite has the ability to create specialized jboss | configurations, start/stop these configurations and run tests | in those configurations. | | Every component that is expected to work in the AS should | have automated integration tests. An integration test is a | test that checks whether stuff that you depend on works in | the way you expect. How you setup fuctional tests for your | component is up to you. | | Cheers | -thomas | | > -----Original Message----- | > From: Alejandro Guizar | > Sent: 24 March 2006 19:56 | > To: Thomas Diesler; Chris Laprun | > Cc: Julien Viet; Dev - JBossWS | > Subject: RE: wsrp integration | > | > Thomas, | > | > I saw a WSRP folder under | testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/webservice | > and testsuite/src/resources/webservice and thought the | place for BPEL | > integration tests should also be there. | > | > Does your comment imply that both the WSRP and BPEL tests should be | > placed elsewhere? If so, what is your suggestion? | [...]/jbpm/bpel and | > [...]/portal/wsrp seem fine to me, except that neither | Portal nor jBPM | > is an integral component of the Appserver. | > | > -Alejandro | > | > > -----Original Message----- | > > From: Thomas Diesler | > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:54 AM | > > To: Chris Laprun | > > Cc: Julien Viet; Anil Saldhana; Dev - JBossWS | > > Subject: RE: wsrp integration | > > | > > | > > The WSRP integration testsuite would probably also have | integration | > tests | > > other than for jbossws. | > > | > > -thomas | > > | > > | > > >-----Original Message----- | > > >From: Thomas Diesler | > > >Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:52 | > > >To: Chris Laprun | > > >Cc: Julien Viet; Anil Saldhana; Dev - JBossWS | > > >Subject: RE: wsrp integration | > > > | > > > | > > >>But these tests would still be located in the | webservice testsuite | > > >>though, right? | > > > | > > >No, WSRP is just another jbossws client and should have its own | > > >integration testsuite. | > > > | > > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | > > >Thomas Diesler | > > >Web Service Lead | > > >JBoss Inc. | > > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | > > > | > > > | > > >>-----Original Message----- | > > >>From: Chris Laprun | > > >>Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:48 | > > >>To: Thomas Diesler | > > >>Cc: Julien Viet; Anil Saldhana; Dev - JBossWS | > > >>Subject: Re: wsrp integration | > > >> | > > >> | > > >>On Mar 24, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Thomas Diesler wrote: | > > >> | > > >>> IMHO, you need to identify the integration requirements and | > > >>create for | > > >>> these aspects in the main test suite. WSRP functional | > > >aspects do not | > > >>> need to be tested in the main testsuite. | > > >> | > > >>I agree. | > > >> | > > >>> A practical approach would be to create tests when issues | > > >>> actually occur. i.e. you run your wsrp testsuite with | jbossws, | > > >>> for | > > >>every issue | > > >>> you see you create a test in the wsrp integration testsuite. | > > >> | > > >>Makes sense in the shorter term. However, complete | coverage would | > > >>be ideal in the long run both for WS and WSRP. | > > >> | > > >>> There should be a tests-wsrp target in the testsuite | that runs | > > >>> the collection of integration tests. wsrp integration tests do | > > >>not belong | > > >>> in the webservice testsuite. i.e. should not run as part of | > > >>> tests-webservice | > > >> | > > >>But these tests would still be located in the | webservice testsuite | > > >>though, right? | > > >> | > > >>Best, | > > >>Chris | > > >> | > > >>== | > > >>JBoss Portal Developer / WSRP Architect | > > >> | > > >> | > > >> | > > >> | ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
