The reason is I don't want inconsistent defaults for bytecode
generation. If this is handled by the integration layers that is fine,
but let's get those layers configured correctly to use javassist by
default.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Steve Ebersole
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:06 PM
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Should 4.0.4 have cgilib in 
> jbossall-client.jar
> 
> I would guess that actually breaks regardless as the thing 
> that gets serialized in the two cases is completely different 
> under the covers between those two versions of hibernate 
> because of the introduction of the javassist capability.  If 
> this situation is really a requirement, we will probably need 
> to add some serious deserialization logic to the serializable-proxy.
> 
> As for needing a version of hibernate where javassist is the 
> default bytecode library, I don't get why.  For the 
> hibernate-int code we could handle that specifically in the 
> MBean.  For the EJB3 case, we should be able to do something 
> similar.  I am very against changing this default in Hibernate itself.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to