If I recall correctly, they tried that setup initially but ran into the locking issues that plagued the earlier Hibernate/JBossCache integrations.
Conceivably they could try with the new optimistic-locking-based provider, but we really need some performance numbers here to see how a local, optimistic JBossCache configuration performs against EhCache... Good point - why doesn't Portal ship with Hibernate configured with JBoss Cache? On 12 May 2006, at 19:34, Adrian Brock wrote: <SNIP /> > > The solutions are: > 1) JBoss Portal's session factory is configured to use JBoss Cache > not EhCache <SNIP /> ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development