yes.
Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 April 2001 13:00
> To: jboss-user
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Performance (was Re: [JBoss-user]
> JBoss verses
> Or ion)
>
>
> You are new around here aren't you?
>
> marc
>
>
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:20 AM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Performance (was Re: [JBoss-user]
> JBoss verses
> |Or ion)
> |
> |
> |The Apache Foundation has money.
> |
> |They also have no EJB container as yet.
> |
> |Has anyone spoken to "them"?
> |
> |Matt
> |
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> |> Sent: 01 April 2001 05:23
> |> To: marc fleury; danch; jboss-user; jboss-development
> |> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Performance (was Re: [JBoss-user]
> |> JBoss verses
> |> Orion)
> |>
> |>
> |> And who after this will have the guts to argue that we don't
> |> need a full
> |> time dedicated core that professionally integrates and QAs
> |> the code. It was
> |> running beautifully not so long ago...
> |>
> |> I rest my case.
> |>
> |> Stuff like this is killing us, makes us look like
> |> amateurs...the answer to
> |> our problem is $$$
> |>
> |> And I am working on it, as hard as i can...
> |>
> |> marc
> |>
> |> PS: The Apache web server went through the same.
> |>
> |>
> |> |-----Original Message-----
> |> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> |> Behalf Of marc
> |> |fleury
> |> |Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 11:09 PM
> |> |To: danch; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> |> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Performance (was Re: [JBoss-user]
> |> JBoss verses
> |> |Orion)
> |> |
> |> |
> |> ||I've spent the day running some test similiar to Paul's.
> |> ||
> |> ||My environment is Linux on a PIII 500, running Sun's 1.3 and
> |> ||1.3.1beta JDKs.
> |> ||
> |> ||In the case of a standalone client looping and repeatedly
> |> calling the
> |> ||same method on a stateless session bean, I found that
> Orion averaged
> |> ||about 3ms. per invocation where JBoss was averaging 6-10
> |> ms/invocation.
> |> |
> |> |It is very broken we have been running the stuff at well
> below those
> |> |numbers.
> |> |
> |> |In fact we ran around 1-2 ms (depending on stateless).
> we will see.
> |> |
> |> |Pfffff, tired...
> |> |
> |> |marc
> |> |
> |> |
> |> |_______________________________________________
> |> |Jboss-development mailing list
> |> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> |>
> |>
> |> _______________________________________________
> |> JBoss-user mailing list
> |> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> |>
> |
> |
> |*******************************************************************
> |***********
> |
> |Check us out at http://www.syntegra.com
> |
> |*************************************************************
> **********
> |
> |_______________________________________________
> |JBoss-user mailing list
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
******************************************************************************
Check us out at http://www.syntegra.com
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
