Hi!
Phan Anh Tran wrote:
> Anyone thinks EJB 2.0 CMB dependent object class and dependent value class and
> the contract definition stinks? Waay to many details. And it seems like a lot
> of the details could have been easily solve with a decent O/R tool. Ie. keep
> the existing CMP specs and define an O/R tool plug-in interface.
I have the opposite view. I think that the EJB 2.0 CMP design is great:
a declarative view for bean programmers, and loads of ways for the CMP
implementor to optimize the usage.
Do you have any specifics on what is bad?
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
