Marc, Falko,
My initial interest was just that, I believe that something such as that
can play a role similar to Cloudscape in the J2EE RI and WebLogic, and
JDataStore in Inprise. As the default persistence mechanism as it is all
java and has little required management. Possibly better because it is an
OODBMS.
Although I was confused with what was written on the site as it sounded as
though they were going to write a whole container. Which is why I thought it
was out of date (also calling it EJBoss) Falko kind of cleared it up,
although if someone ?Rickard? could care to comment on how it would fit in
the "plugin" architecture. (Sorry, I'm not intimate with the code, yet.) I
believe that JAWS is a JDBC plugin only. Would this fit into JAWS or be an
option to be used in place of JAWS.
RE: Inprise/Borland - No longer, I am starting my hand at something slightly
new, nothing against them - they have some great technology, just seeing the
future in a different light. Similar to some here, which is why I'm here....
kind regards,
-Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: jBoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 2:13 PM
Subject: [jBoss-User] Ozone
> Hi Falko,
>
> yes we discussed this back when we were looking for a backend for jboss.
It
> happens that most of us believe in the Object database thing. It is just
> that we needed to provide a back end and a JDBC one at that pretty fast.
> Most people need the container on top of their existing Database so jdbc
CMP
> is a must. For folks that don't have the SQL database as a requirement,
we
> are still very interested in providing alternative container plugins for
CMP
> object persistence and more so now that EJB2.0 is out public.
>
> regards
>
> marc
>
> PS: rob aren't you with Inprise?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Falko Braeutigam
> > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 6:05 AM
> > To: jBoss; Rob Castaneda; jBoss
> > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Is this outdated....
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Rob Castaneda wrote:
> > > ...or what?
> > >
> > > "Right now we are discussing the possibilities to build an EJB
> > container for
> > > EJBoss...."
> > >
> > > http://www.ozone-db.org/ozonies_main.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Cool they can make us a container! :-)
> >
> > The site doesn't say that the ozone team will make a container
> > for EJBoss or
> > that we are able to do so - but that we (Marc and me) are discussing
> > _possibilities_ to use ozone as the back-end store. Unfortunately
> > we didn't
> > came to a definite conclusion how this could be done or if it
> > would make sense
> > at all. But so far, neither Marc nor I have said that such a
> > combination is
> > definitely not possible, so the EJBoss link is still on the ozone site.
> >
> > This short note on the ozone site is meant to force people that are more
> > familiar with the combination of EJB and OODBMS to say their
> > opinion or to ask
> > about such a project. It seems that you don't like this. Anyway,
> > I don't see
> > your name on any of the jBoss sources, so I assume that you don't
> > speak for
> > jBoss.
> >
> >
> > Falko
> > --
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Falko Braeutigam mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > softwarebuero m&b (SMB) http://www.softwarebuero.de
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
